As Dan Mitchell noted below, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has launched a "Campaign for Free Enterprise" to stop the "rapidly growing influence of government over private-sector activity." Chamber president Thomas Donohue told the Wall Street Journal that an "avalanche of new rules, restrictions, mandates and taxes" could "seriously undermine the wealth- and job-creating capacity of the nation." Indeed. Given the scope and extent of the Obama administration's assaults on private enterprise — national health insurance, energy central planning, pay czars, abrogation of contracts, skyrocketing spending, and so on -- free enterprise can use all the help it can get. I welcome the Chamber to the fight. But it would be nice if the Chamber had joined the fight for economic freedom a bit earlier, say back in February when many of us were trying to stop the administration's massive "stimulus" spending bill. That bill’s official cost is $787 billion; with interest, it would be about $1.3 trillion; and if you assume that its temporary spending increases will be extended, it will cost taxpayers about $3.27 trillion over 10 years. Back then, Donohue had a few criticisms of the bill, but
The bottom line is that at the end of the day, we're going to support the legislation. Why? Because with the markets functioning so poorly, the government is the only game in town capable of jump-starting the economy.
Or they might even have started defending free enterprise last fall, instead of going all-out to push the TARP bailout through Congress. Converts to the cause of limited government are always welcome. But we might not need a $100 million Campaign for Free Enterprise if American business had opposed big government when the votes were going down in Congress. Still, better late than never.